Chosen theme: Risk Management Mistakes to Avoid. Welcome to a candid, practical journey through the pitfalls that quietly undermine resilience. If you’ve ever felt blindsided by risks you “should” have seen coming, this page is for you. Read on, share your experiences, and subscribe for real-world tactics that work when pressure mounts.

Blind Spots in Risk Identification

Too many teams treat last year’s list as a checklist, not a starting point. That habit blinds you to emerging threats, novel dependencies, and evolving behaviors that render familiar risks smaller than the ones lurking offstage. Rebuild from zero quarterly, and invite dissenting voices.

Blind Spots in Risk Identification

A near-miss is a free rehearsal for disaster. When weak signals are dismissed as noise, you trade insight for false comfort. Aggregate small anomalies, log them with context, and look for patterns. If your dashboard never surprises you, your detection is failing.

Flawed Risk Assessment and Scoring

01
Color codes comfort us into binary thinking. Two medium risks interacting can outweigh a single high risk. Force narrative justifications with each score and link to evidence. If the rationale fits on one line, the assessment is probably too superficial.
02
A fintech team learned this the hard way when two vendors failed during the same regional outage. They had rated each vendor independently. Map shared dependencies—cloud regions, key people, legal jurisdictions—to reveal correlation. Share a time correlation surprised you and what you changed afterward.
03
Point estimates invite precision theater. Build a few vivid scenarios—optimistic, base, and stressed—and attach triggers to each. Use ranges, not absolutes. Invite peers to attack your assumptions. Subscribe to get a downloadable scenario worksheet you can adapt for product, finance, or operations.

Mitigation Plans Without Owners or Triggers

Every mitigation needs a named owner with authority, not just responsibility. Define who can spend, who can pause, and who signs off on trade-offs. Publish this in a shared space. Comment with your best tip for keeping ownership real when priorities collide.

Treating Controls as Set-and-Forget

Test Cadence and Evidence, Not Assumptions

Document how a control is validated and how often. Keep artifacts—screenshots, logs, approvals—so audits are painless and trust is earned. Rotate testers to avoid familiarity bias. Share your control testing cadence in the comments to help others benchmark without guesswork.

Change Management Is a Risk Control Too

Unreviewed changes quietly bypass strong controls. Tie deployment gates to risk tiers. For high-impact systems, require dual approval and rollback rehearsal. A small retailer avoided a payment outage by catching a harmless-looking config update—their weekly change huddle paid off.

Third-Party Controls and Supply-Chain Reality

Outsourcing does not outsource accountability. Ask vendors for control mappings, test results, and incident histories. Define exit ramps and backups in contracts, not after a failure. Subscribe for our checklist to evaluate vendor resilience without getting lost in acronyms.

Communication and Escalation Failures

Translate risk into outcomes leaders care about: customer trust, legal exposure, revenue at risk. Replace jargon with quantifiable scenarios and time to impact. Invite a board sponsor to a quarterly drill. Comment with one metric your leadership actually asks for.

Communication and Escalation Failures

Create psychological safety for early escalation. Praise the messenger publicly. Use lightweight status colors tied to pre-agreed thresholds. A healthtech team reduced incident duration by half after adopting a rule: report suspicion within fifteen minutes, even if details are fuzzy.

Overconfidence and Model Risk

List assumptions explicitly—volatility bounds, recovery times, behavior under stress. Assign someone to challenge each one with data. Revisit after incidents. If an assumption cannot be tested, flag the model as advisory, not authoritative, and communicate that clearly.

Overconfidence and Model Risk

Compare predictions to reality regularly and publish the misses. Track model drift and recalibrate schedules. Create an escalation rule for material divergence. Share in the comments how you decide a model has earned or lost its production status.

Blameless Postmortems with Visible Follow-Through

Hold blameless reviews within five days, focus on system conditions, and publish actions with owners and deadlines. Track closure publicly. A logistics team cut repeat incidents by a third after turning postmortem actions into sprint backlog items everyone could see.

Build a Near-Miss Library People Actually Use

Tag near-misses by domain, system, and trigger. Write short, narrative summaries and link to data. Review a rotating handful in planning meetings to shape mitigations. Share one near-miss from your team—anonymized is fine—and what you changed next.
Grivaom
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.